More

    UK’s Thirdfort nabs $20M for tools to help with ID verification, and detect money laundering and payment fraud

    Money laundering has been a hot topic of late in the UK, which is facing pressure to not just make tighter rules to track down the origins of money that’s spent on large assets in the country like prime real estate — the capital city has been dubbed by some as the “London laundromat” — but also, in light of sanctions on Russia in recent weeks, actually to enforce those rules.

    Today, a London startup called Thirdfort, which has built a platform to help professional services firms run more thorough due diligence, and to flag when something is suspicious, is announcing a funding round of £15 million (about $20 million), money that it will be using to continue expanding its services, specifically to build payment infrastructure directly into its platform.

    The raise, a Series A, was led by Breega, with B2B fintech-focused Element Ventures also investing, along with the founders of ComplyAdvantage, Tessian, Fenergo, R3, Funding Circle and Fidel.

    MD Olly Thornton-Berry said that he and Jack Bidgood first came upon the idea for Thirdfort after a friend of theirs lost £25,000 while buying a flat in London due to a phishing attack: fraudsters had picked up some data about the deal, and created a domain similar to that of the legal firm the friend was using for the purchase, and with that wrote an email impersonating the friend’s lawyer, asking for the sum to be transferred via a link. It was only weeks later that the friend was legitimately asked for the same sum that they all started to suspect foul play. The friend never recovered that money.

    The incident, Thornton-Berry said, highlighted how little information both professional services companies require of a customer before entering into a business dealing, and how little protection the client has against more sophisticated fraud attempts.

    This led to Thirdfort, which provides a big-data toolkit of multiple resources such as data from LexisNexis, ComplyAdvantage, Companies House and more that can be corralled (and picked by the client) to provide different data points about individuals and their sources of money. Thirdfort has built tools first to address the needs of companies in the legal and property markets.

    The product today comes in two parts. First, there is the “risk engine” built for its business clients, which can be used both for KYC (know your customer) checks as well as to help companies comply with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. There are around the 700 businesses already using the platform, including law firms DAC Beachcroft, Penningtons Manches Cooper and Mishcon de Reya; and property businesses Knight Frank, Strutt & Parker and Winkworth.

    Second, there is an app built for consumer customers of those businesses. This has been built on open banking infrastructure to connect up those businesses with the customer’s bank, by way of the banks’ own banking apps, for payments and related transactions to be made in a secure way. This has now been downloaded some 500,000 times.

    Similar to Alloy in the U.S. (which is a potential competitor, if either expands into the other’s market), the pitch here with Thirdfort is that the work that would have had to go into running similar identification and origin-of-funds research would have mostly been drawn-out, largely manual and expensive to run, if it had been run at all. That’s because, unfortunately, it’s often in the interest of a business just to get a deal done, as fast as possible, which provides a major disincentive to run thorough diligence beyond making sure that the money will actually materialize. This is one reason why regulation to enforce that process is important here.

    But while stronger regulation has been on the cards and pushed back a number of times over the years in the UK, it appears that times are changing — under pressure from world events and considerably more public scrutiny and harsh criticism. In sum, companies are and will be compelled to do more of this work, and that presents an opportunity to companies like Thirdfort.

    Previously, an ID check, and then seeing that this tallies up with data one one of the big identity databases, did the trick. And if a bank statement was needed, often all that professional services companies needed was a fax or PDF of one, but fake versions of these can easily be acquired online (I won’t link to the sites here).

    “Now, what’s required is a lot more,” Thornton-Berry said. “They need to run an in-depth level of due diligence, seeing bank statements [from banks, to determine] what is moving in and out, asking clients specific questions, diligence checks on gifted money if the sum is specified as a gift. It’s a whole new kind of workflow that’s come into existence with AML going up.”

    And while Thirdfort today focuses primarily on fraud detection — it’s managed to halt around one dozen dodgy transactions for its customers, Thornton-Barry said — it’s also built for AML diligence and compliance regulations and will likely come into its own when these are run more widely, especially around any large transactions involving international money.

    “For both consumers and professional services, the risk of fraud and the need for compliance represents a massive burden,” Maxence Drummond, Principal at Breega, said in a statement. “Consumers need to get verified for every transaction, and regulated professionals spend too much of their valuable time on client verification and compliance.

    Dream Hub Africa
    Dream Hub Africa
    Curating dreams within the African context and beyond one person at a time. Engineering Fundamentals and information for borderless and global leverage through transforming and impactful conversations.

    Latest articles

    Related articles